![]() I started using Clarisse a couple of months ago and found that once I got past the basics of the user interface and their differing workflow, it is an incredibly powerful tool! I have rendered shots in Clarisse in the past few weeks that I simply would not have been able to render in any other application and would have had to find another way of tackling the shots. I don’t know what exactly is wrong with your particular install, and it’s unlike me to post in these sorts of threads, but I feel i have to come to Isotropix defence here. Their marketing message about greater ease of use for the artist, and their inclusion of a compositing tool, were of real interest to me. ![]() But I am sorry to say that I cannot see Isotropix breaking into the market with a product like this. The 3D market can even at its matured stage be broken into. I can only describe Clarisse as a Monty Python skit. ![]() That’s as silly as paying tour guides to take you up the Andes on an all expenses tour and then the guide says to you “I’m not sure which path to use to go up the Andes- do you know?” You don’t pay 1000 bucks to have do Isotropix’s work for them. It’s not MY job to work out which version of python 2 to use. I should not be required to “be the program engineer” for goodness sake. Even Blender sorts this python stuff out. Which version of python 2? Who knows? Get a magic 8 ball out. So I went to the manual and found really a total lack of help. I tried to create geometry and saw an error message about me lacking python. ![]() After 10 minutes I gave up trying to render. I couldn’t work out how to do a boilerplate render. I wanted to see more competition in the 3D market. I wanted to be tempted to spend 1000 dollars. Yesterday I downloaded the PLE of Clarisse iFX by Isotropix. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |